SAMUEL HANAGID AND “THE
LAW OF MAN”
One of the most enduring symbols of
the so-called Golden Age of Spain—at least for Jews-in-the-know—is the poet,
statesman, warrior, Talmudic scholar, and patron Samuel Hanagid—Samuel the
Prince. Born in
My experience of Samuel the Nagid is of a passionate, emotional, sensitive, thoughtful, religious man. All of this is summed up especially well in the beginning of the first poem in Peter Cole’s fine collection of poems by the Nagid (all quotes in this little essay are drawn from this book, and the complete poems are on this web site):
Spirit splits in its asking,
and soul in its wanted is balked;
and the body, fattened, is vital and full—
its precious being uneasy . . .
But the modest man
walks on the earth with his
thought drawn toward sky.
What good is the pulse of man’s flesh
and its favors
when the mind is in pain?
Here are splitting, wanting, balking,
vitality, fullness, preciousness, uneasiness, modesty, and pain—a broad
spectrum of human qualities—and in addition a reflective, carefully observant
narrator interpreting what he sees and offering indirect advice: “the modest
man/walks on earth with his/thought drawn toward the sky.” We must
simultaneously have our feet on the ground and our thoughts in heaven. And we
must recognize that mind and body cannot be separated—we can try to lose
ourselves in the pleasures of the flesh but will never succeed when our “mind
is in pain.”
The Nagid’s times were difficult
times, for even in the midst of the Golden Age, the
A self-seriousness and tiredness permeate many of the Nagid’s poems. We lead a life of toil and trouble and then, toward the end, try to figure out what we have learned from life and, if we are lucky, how to condense this learning into sayings.
“The Market” is the most striking, or one of the most striking, of Samuel Hanagid’s poems, a graphic description of the marketplace as a metaphor for life. In addition, the poem surveys his various genres and modes—the blood and guts of Psalms, the concise wisdom of Proverbs, the cynicism of Ecclesiastes. Above the fray stands the Nagid, dispensing judgment in the form of the “law of man.” Or is this meant to be the voice of God, projecting through the Nagid? One can almost hear a refrain at the end: “For I am the Lord, your God.”
In the first stanza the poet, in the first person, describes a walk through the meat and fish markets. This is the marketplace of life, a hot, brutal, bloody place where people do what they need to do and divide the spoils accordingly.
I crossed through a souk where the butchers
hung oxen and sheep at their sides…
as blood congealed over blood
and slaughterers’ knives opened veins.
The poet asks, “What separates you from these beasts”?, then introduces God: “If He wanted this instant/He’d easily put you in their place.” He continues with a nod to Ecclesiastes, saying “there was never a time when the living didn’t die,/nor the young that they bear not give birth.” At the end comes a proverb of sorts:
Pay attention to this, you pure ones,
and princes so calm in your fame,
know if you’d fathom the worlds of the hidden:
This is the law of man.
If the Nagid offers any answer to
these questions, it is that this is the way things are; it is a medieval
statement of
When I was in
I wandered up and down the streets of
where I thought the Jews had lived, sniffing the air, “dowsing,” at it were,
for the location of the memorial or square. I thought I might just stumble on
this memorial in an aha! experience. No such luck. Only when I returned home to
the States and began looking harder, did I learn of the location of the
memorial; but even then I could never find it on a street map of
As with the memorial to the Nagid,
locating the reality of the man is challenging. Was Samuel Hanagid an original
poet, or did he follow the stylized conventions of his day, emulating Arabic
poetry? Did he and the other medieval Hebrew poets attend all-night drinking
parties and make passes at young boys and girls, as intimated by his poems? How
could a Jew become so highly favored by a Muslim ruler when Jews in general
were still treated as second-class citizens? Was he everything he said he was,
that we think he was, and did he do everything he said he did and that we think
he did or would like him to have done? Was there really a Golden Age of
Scholars such as Ross Brann, Dan Pagis, and Raymond P. Scheindlin deal with questions like these, though not necessarily or always in relation to Samuel Hanagid. Still, in spite of some very convincing answers, as with poetry itself, perhaps clear and final answers are not the order of the day. And perhaps “precise” truth is less interesting or important than myths. Yes, knowing the truth about the Nagid would have value, but at the same time, in today’s world, which, in spite of its riches, seems almost the opposite of a Golden Age, I think there is some value as well to a myth, to a metaphor, based not on the reality of the marketplace but instead on a deeper reality, “the worlds of the hidden,” for “this [too] is the law of man.”
Brann, Ross. The Compunctious Poet: Cultural Ambiguity
and Hebrew Poetry in Muslim
Pagis, Dan. Hebrew
Poetry of the Middle Ages and Renaissance.
Scheindlin, Raymond
P. Wine, Women, and Death: Medieval
Hebrew Poems on the Good Life.
–Henry
Rasof
© 2007
by Henry Rasof and medievalhebrewpoetry.org